, 2015; Cardoso and you can Souza, 2016; Santiago and you may Saliba, 2016; 2 Santos and you will Jalalzai, 2021). Contained in this really works we’ll work at misogyny once the identified by our interviewees in the context of Rousseff’s 6 years during the strength, specifically concentrating on the relationship ranging from misogynistic backlash and gendered twice bind figure known. About after the part we offer a more nuanced meaning to possess all the subcategories known (select Table 2), bringing stay-alone significance and you may instances about investigation and descriptive analyses off secret minutes for the Rousseff’s presidency one exemplify the fresh dynamic anywhere between all of our nuanced proposition for taking a look at brand new gendered double join, misogynist backlash, and its particular impact into the Rousseff’s presidency.
New five subcategories understood appeared in the data within varying accounts (find Tables 3, 4). A couple templates appeared in highest proportion: Testing so you can Guys and you may Misogynyments themed as the testing so you can guys checked into the almost half the interview and you may represented thirty-six percent from all of the statements codifiedments themed while the misogyny have been the vast majority of statements (38 per cent) and you will starred in 49 per cent of all of the interviews. Put differently, interviewees have been very cognizant out of Rousseff’s character due to the fact chairman in contrast with other male political leaders and previous presidents, and means Rousseff try penalized during her management on account of gendered expectation and https://internationalwomen.net/sv/asiatiska-kvinnor/ backlash.
When you are lookin with quicker volume throughout the interviews, others a few templates render crucial framework to help you expertise possible sexist backlash in presidency away from Brazil’s earliest lady president. Discussions precisely how Rousseff made an effort to adhere to gendered standard ascribed so you can women (Complying toward Double Bind) starred in over 10 percent of one’s feedback coded and interviews held. At the same time, conversation exactly how Rousseff challenged the fresh new gendered hopes of her status (Problematic brand new Twice Bind) starred in more one fifth of all of the interview, constituting 16 percent of all comments coded.
Brand new dysfunction of one’s mathematical thickness of one’s thematic investigation will bring a kick off point in order to a great qualitative study of every theme, targeting the connection anywhere between for each and every theme, particularly the commitment within three themes actually connected with the fresh new gendered twice join (review, complying, and you may challenging) plus the misogynistic backlash you to implemented.
Testing to men
Among the subcategories understood are contrasting away from Dilma Rousseff so you can guys, both researching Rousseff in order to men people in politics and you may explaining exactly how anything would be more in the event that Rousseff was basically one. Ergo, i discovered that there clearly was both a conceptual part and you may basic component to their comparison so you’re able to guys. Inside the an abstract feel, we quite often watched the definition of, “if she was indeed a person” to describe how a position might have starred out differently had Dilma maybe not started a female. The fresh story portrayed inside our interview try out of a network one to “favors men” (Respondent 88, ), having “zero discover gender discrimination, nevertheless the undeniable fact that [a beneficial politician] try a guy is a plus” (Respondent 8, ). Whenever discussing that it comparison way more concretely, there is a look closely at Rousseff’s scratchy character, this new “difficult woman as much as delicate men.” This new quote below will bring even more framework:
Conversations about Rousseff’s impeachment therefore the sexism and you will misogyny trailing this new procedure was indeed chatted about from inside the well-known news (Hao, 2016; Hertzman, 2016; Romero and you will Kaiser, 2016) plus scholarly works (Zdebskyi et al
Yes, and they asserted that she are a difficult individual, that she couldn’t keep in touch with individuals, you to she got a keen authoritarian way of talking. Everything that for males looks like a supplement “zero, he could be an arduous person, a home-pretty sure person that understands just what the guy desires.” In order to their own try exhibited just like the negative “zero, she will not can cam, the woman is difficult, she actually is which” for the a poor method. How they communicate with united states, women. You will find attained a particular updates, our company is are severe, our company is deviating out-of in order to how to become a woman, who is nice, clear, quiet and you may such. The form of Dilma becoming is the form of ladies who have the ability to feel strong within a completely patriarchal industry, facing which buy one is obtainable (Respondent 79, ).