Hypotheses Examination
Hypothesis 1 predicted a curvilinear (inverted U-shaped) relationship between the number of friends a profile owner has and observers’ perceptions of the profile owner’s (a) social and (b) physical attractiveness. In order to test these relationships, one-way analyses of variance (ANOVA) were conducted with number of friends as the independent variable and social attractiveness and physical attractiveness as the dependent variables. Hypothesis 1a was supported. Results showed a significant quadratic effect for the relationship of number of friends on social attractiveness, F (1, 129) = 2.78, p = .098, ? 2 = .02. 2 2 A statistical significance rule of p < .10 for directional hypothesis tests was employed, given the a priori prediction of the inverted-U curvilinear function (see Levine & Banas, 2002 ). Descriptive statistics appear in Table 1. In order to confirm the direction of the curve, the means were subjected to a post-hoc least significant differences (LSD) test. That is, targets were viewed as most socially attractive when they had 302 friends.
- Note: Means with different superscripts differ within columns at the p < .05 level.
The connection between amount of friends and you may real elegance failed to follow the predict curvilinear relationship. All round F additionally the certain test having quadratic outcomes had been not significant, F (1, 129) = dos.47, p = .119. Theory 1b wasn’t supported. Post-hoc LSD analyses don’t inform you one pairwise variations one of several four setting (come across Dining table 1).
Hypothesis 2 predicted a beneficial linear matchmaking amongst the number of family unit members a profile proprietor keeps and you can observers’ thinking of your reputation owner’s extraversion. A keen omnibus one-means ANOVA which have extraversion since the mainly based variable are extreme, F (cuatro, 129) = 3.several, p= .02. However, the brand new linear perception given of the H2 was not offered, F (1, 1dos9) = dos.thirty-two, p = .13. Instead afrointroductions, a critical quartic effect emerged, F (1, 129) = 5.66, p= .02. Blog post hoc analysis playing with LSD evaluations showed significant pairwise distinctions certainly some of the tissues suggesting (a) good curvilinear upside-down-U effect total, toward highest amount of extraversion taking place at the 502 members of the family height. Even in the event thought of extraversion trailed of outside of the top, the better amounts of friends (702 and you will 902) started believe it or not extraversion than the top. Yet not, a decreased quantities of household members (102 or 302) caused rather down extraversion judgments compared to apex out of 502 (look for Desk 1 for over results). It seems that having a great deal more relatives actually connotes deeper extraversion to possess Facebook reputation owners, quite as the predicted, however, that the association is not an immediate linear trend. The most extroverted attributions is actually directed to individuals having a greater-than-mediocre amount of relatives.
Discussion
The purpose of this study was to influence the sort away from the partnership between sociometric indicators out of connectedness illustrated towards Fb and you may brand new societal attractiveness, bodily attractiveness, and extraversion of your own profile holder detected by other people. This research posed questions relating to the kind of them matchmaking and next found outcomes of the information from the brand new social network system with the others’ impression of people inside the a social media environment.
There was a curvilinear relationship within amount of family relations one to character citizens are speculated to has actually and you will others’ thinking of their personal attractiveness. Much more especially, regarding updates the spot where the character holder met with the fewest family members (102), ratings of the individual’s personal attractiveness had been one of the reduced. Product reviews of your individual’s public elegance was indeed higher if the profile presented your character manager had whenever 3 hundred family members. Beyond you to definitely quantity of household members, recommendations out-of a visibility user’s social elegance denied in order to an amount handling brand new 102 nearest and dearest standing. However, there was no significant differences between personal attractiveness on extremely reduced and also finest level of friends’ criteria, absolutely the values of your own relevant form is popular on guidance one to suggests it is better for a lot of friends than to provides too little.