From inside the Try out 1 (in line with the browse paradigm because of the Vigliocco ainsi que al., 2005) we made use of a categorization task, where users had been requested to decide several words out-of an excellent triad, in accordance with the first organization regarding their similarity. The goal were to have a look at whether not as much as such as for example standards grammatical intercourse outcomes 
was establish having abstract terms, labels off animals and you can inanimate things. For the Test dos, based on the Implicit Association Take to (IAT) paradigm, players did a good semantic categorization activity significantly less than major time tension. The target was to glance at whether grammatical gender is implicitly available when doing a role you to works in the lexical and you will semantic level. Within the Research 3, i checked out new attribution away from male and female sounds so you can dogs and you may inanimate things, presented both just like the terms and conditions otherwise images, in order to make sure whether the influence away from grammatical sex happens beyond the lexical and you will semantic account and you can towards artwork representations, and you may myself contrasting the effects having spoken and you can visual stimulus. I believed your obtained results enable me to test the newest assumptions of the intercourse and you may sex hypothesis plus the resemblance and you can intercourse theory in the context of the fresh new Gloss vocabulary.
According to the sex and gender theory, grammatical sex outcomes are required to-be more powerful in dialects which have a top feel between the grammatical sex regarding nouns in addition to physical gender of the referents
During the Shine, which texture is restricted by fact that you’ll find around three genders from the just one means (masculine, female, neutral) as well as 2 men and women in the plural mode (masculine-private and non-masculine-personal), which have slightly a complex relation to their only 1 equivalents. Grammatical gender off nouns may differ ranging from its only 1 and you can plural models – the fresh new non-masculine-individual plural setting surrounds every only 1 form nouns apart from masculine nouns dealing with someone. Such as, ‘10 pies’ (your pet dog) that’s male when you look at the one function, gets ‘te psy’ (dogs), that’s low-masculine-private for the plural, but ‘ten kowal’ (an excellent blacksmith, masculine only 1) will get ‘ci kowale’ (blacksmiths, masculine-individual plural). A less constrained variety of the intercourse and you can gender hypothesis would assume there to be grammatical gender outcomes only for nouns it comes down so you can pets and you can people – with a biological intercourse. From the three tests displayed within this papers, i provided nouns discussing dogs (Try step 1 and you can step three), inanimate things (the tests) and you will conceptual facts (Experiment step 1).
The latest rigorous version of the brand new gender and you will sex hypothesis create ergo expect deficiencies in grammatical sex consequences during the Polish, not instead of of a lot published studies in german
Several other grounds strongly related to the new sex and you may gender/similarity and you may sex hypotheses is that the Gloss vocabulary uses a great wide variety of gender matical intercourse strongly related of a lot components of message, not just to nouns. Grammatical intercourse has to be believed when using verbs, numerals, adjectives, pronouns, etcetera. And also the similarity and sex hypothesis would predict you to grammatical gender effects be present in most the new demonstrated experiments, playing with each other animate and you may inanimate nouns. Watching grammatical gender outcomes to have nouns writing on stuff which do n’t have a biological sex would offer strong assistance with the similarity and intercourse theory.
The fresh displayed search in addition to aims to try one or two much more particular search issues. Test dos uses a customized implicit relationship decide to try to research if grammatical sex outcomes when you look at the Gloss exist to the lexicosemantic peak, and not just with the conceptual top. Try step 3 uses a method that requires attributing masculine/feminine voices to stuff inside a move movie) to evaluate whether grammatical gender outcomes can be found to the a conceptual top. Incase referring to lexicosemantic and you may abstract amounts of control, i make use of the distinction like in Vigliocco et al. (2005, p. 510): the newest lexicosemantic height corresponds to this new significance out-of terms and conditions as well as their linguistic running (installing for the classes, retrieving and utilizing lexical advice, an such like.) without having to carry out rational representations of your own words’ referents. Conversely, the latest abstract level is founded on this new intellectual representations of one’s referents in addition to their characteristics, that is non-linguistic in the wild. Using vocabulary in place of dealing with rational representations off stuff is strictly lexicosemantic, when you’re running rational representations without using vocabulary is strictly conceptual.