The fresh new SH QTL toward chromosome 3 was also consistent with the QTLs to possess Sur (Extra file 1: Table S2)

The fresh new SH QTL toward chromosome 3 was also consistent with the QTLs to possess Sur (Extra file 1: Table S2)

A separate area into the chromosome seven to own SH is actually understood from the screening the people from the screenhouse

Toward people Kalarata/NSIC Rc238, a total of five significant QTLs towards chromosomes 3, 5, six, eight, and 8 was indeed understood to own En ce qui concerne significantly less than each other tests criteria (Dining table dos). About three high QTLs was perceived for SH towards the chromosomes step 1, step 3, and eight, at which QTLs with the chromosomes 1 and you can 3 have been perceived within the both tests standards.

The fresh new En ce qui concerne QTLs qSUR5–step one (known qSUR5–1

The tolerant parent Kalarata contributed the SUR QTLs qSUR3–1Rc238-SCR-fourteen, qSUR6–1Rc238-SCR-14, and qSUR7–1Rc238-SCR-fourteen while the QTLs qSUR5–1Rc238-SCR-14 and qSUR8–1 Rc238-SCR-14 came from susceptible parent NSIC Rc238 under screen house condition at 14 DAS (Table 2). Same five QTLs showed effect on survival at 14 DAS under tray-on-table condition and at 21 DAS in both screening conditions. The largest effect QTL qSUR7–1 (named as qSUR7–1Rc238-SCR-14, qSUR7–1Rc238-TAB-14, qSUR7–1Rc238-SCR-21 and qSUR7–1Rc238-TAB-21) showed a LOD score of to and explained % to % of the phenotypic variation, with an additive effect of % to %, followed by qSUR6–1 (named as qSUR6–1Rc238-SCR-14, qSUR6–1Rc238-TAB-14, qSUR6–1Rc238-SCR-21 and qSUR6–1Rc238-SCR-21), which explained % to % of the phenotypic variation, detected by a LOD score of 5.97 to 6.96, and had an additive effect of 9.79% to%. qSUR3–1 (named as qSUR3–1Rc238-SCR-fourteen, qSUR3–1Rc238-TAB-fourteen, qSUR3–1Rc238-SCR-21 and qSUR3–1Rc238-TAB-21) contributed % to % of the phenotypic variation, with an additive effect of % to %. Rc238-SCR-14, qSUR5–1Rc238-TAB-fourteen, qSUR5–1Rc238-SCR-21 and qSUR5–1Rc238-TAB-21) and qSUR8–1 (named as qSUR8–1Rc238-SCR-14, qSUR8–1Rc238-TAB-14, qSUR8–1Rc238-SCR-21 and qSUR8–1Rc238-TAB-21) from high-yielding susceptible parent NSIC Rc238 contributed 9.76% to % and % to % of the phenotypic variation, with LOD scores of 4.10 to 4.57 and 4.78 to 5.21, respectively (Table 2, Additional file 1: Figure S2).

All SH QTLs were contributed by Kalarata, the parent with anaerobic germination potential. The largest effect QTL identified for SH is qSH1–1 (named as qSH1–1Rc238-SCR-21 and qSH1–1Rc238-TAB-21), which is consistent over both screening conditions. It explained a phenotypic variation of 12.5% to 22.1%, with a LOD score of 5.4 to 9.4. The second largest effect QTL detected for SH was consistent with SUR QTL qSH3–1 (named as qSH3–1Rc238-SCR-fourteen, qSH3–1Rc238-SCR-21 and qSH3–1Rc238-TAB-21,), which was also consistent in both screening conditions. This QTL explained phenotypic variation of 10.1% to14.4%, with a https://hookupfornight.com/best-hookup-apps/ LOD score of 3.7 to 5.8 and an additive effect of 0.84% to 5.17%. QTL qSH7–1Rc238-SCR-21 was identified with a LOD score of 4.6 and explained 10.7% of the phenotypic variation and had an additive effect of 4.57%. It was identified only under screenhouse conditions and was located in a different position from the identified QTL (qSUR7–1) for SUR (Additional file 1: Table S2, Additional file 1: Figure S3A). Under controlled conditions, no QTL was detected for germination, whereas one QTL on chromosome 1 (qSH1-2Rc238-CON-21) was detected for SH with an LOD score of 6.1 that could explain 14.1% of the phenotypic variation (Additional file 1: Table S2). Altogether, the identified QTLs for SUR explained phenotypic variation in the range of % to % while that for the trait SH ranged from 10.1% to 36.5% for the Kalarata/NSIC Rc238 population.

To the society Kalarata/NSIC Rc222, all in all, around three extreme QTLs with the chromosomes 3, 6, and you can seven were thought of having En ce qui concerne less than each other examination requirements, which have been also consistent with the earliest inhabitants (Dining table step 3). A few extreme QTLs were observed getting SH to your chromosomes step one and you can 3, where the new QTL with the chromosome step one, sensed lower than each other tests criteria, has also been common with the original populace for similar trait. Throughout circumstances, father or mother Kalarata that have anaerobic germination possible discussed the latest open minded alleles getting AG (Additional file 1: Dining table S3).

Bir cevap yazın

E-posta hesabınız yayımlanmayacak. Gerekli alanlar * ile işaretlenmişlerdir

Başa dön